The USPTO has announced extensions of certain patent and trademark deadlines in accordance with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).
Under some conditions, discussed below, deadlines for filing certain patent and trademark related documents and paying certain required fees that would otherwise have been due between March 27 and May 31 may now be filed on or before June 1.
Qualifying patent-related filings include:
- Response to Office action issued during examination or patent publication processing
- Issue fee
- Filings related to appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), including: notice of appeal; appeal brief; reply brief; appeal forwarding fee; request for an oral hearing; response to a substitute examiner's answer; and amendment when reopening prosecution in response to, or request for rehearing of, a PTAB decision designated as including a new ground of rejection; request for rehearing of a PTAB decision.Petition to the Chief Judge
In addition, small and micro entities may also qualify for extensions on:
- Reply to pre-examination Office notices
- Maintenance fee
For other situations relating to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) not covered above, a request for extension of time can be made by contacting the PTAB if the COVID-19 outbreak has prevented or interfered with a filing before the Board.
Qualifying trademark-related filings include:
- Response to an office action, including a notice of appeal from a final refusal
- Statement of use or request for extension of time to file a statement of use
- Notice of opposition or request for extension of time to file a notice of opposition
- Claiming priority based on an earlier foreign application or international registration
- Transformation of an extension of protection to the United States into a U.S. application
- Affidavit of use or excusable non-use
- Renewal of existing registration
For any matters involving or appearing before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board not covered above, a request or motion for an extension or reopening of time can be made as appropriate.
The extension of time will only be granted if accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment for any of the actions enumerated above was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. A delay is due to COVID-19 if a practitioner, applicant, registrant, patent owner, petitioner, third-party requester, inventor or other person associated with the filing or fee was “personally affected by the COVID-19 outbreak, including, without limitation, through office closures, cash flow interruptions, inaccessibility of files or other materials, travel delays, personal or family illness, or similar circumstances, such that the outbreak materially interfered with timely filing or payment.”
The USPTO is also offering waivers of petition fees for revival or reinstatement of trademark applications and registrations and patent application and reexamination proceedings that have gone abandoned due to an inability to timely respond as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, with a submission of a statement that the delay was due to the COVID-19 outbreak, as discussed above.
These are difficult times worldwide, but the attorneys at Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie are here to help you navigate rapid changes and developments to ensure your business can maintain its trademark rights and be prepared to renew normal business operations as soon as possible.
Please contact David Jackson at djackson@lewisroca.com, Jennifer Van Kirk at jvankirk@lewisroca.com, Shaun Lee at slee@lewisroca.com, Tom Daly at tdaly@lewisroca.com, or your Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie attorney for assistance at any time.
- Partner
David Jackson provides a full spectrum of intellectual property services and works closely with clients to help them develop comprehensive, global brand strategies. Clients value David’s creativity, strategic judgment, and ability to understand their business needs to help them best ...
- Partner
Jennifer Van Kirk counsels clients on a wide variety of intellectual property matters, including all aspects of trademark and brand protection: trademark clearance, prosecution, licensing, portfolio management, and litigation guidance. Her experience includes traditional ...
- Partner
Shaun is attentive, thoughtful, and analytical. His clients rely on him to protect their interests in cost-effective ways.
Shaun Lee assists clients in protecting their intellectual property assets, specifically though patent prosecution, trademark prosecution, and enforcement, as ...
- Partner
A born problem-solver, Tom brings a calm, knowledgeable, and logical approach to his clients' biggest challenges.
Thomas Daly is a partner in Lewis Roca’s Intellectual Property Practice Group. Clients appreciate the more than 25 years of experience in intellectual property law that he ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam