As industry leaders and businesses tackle the question of how to decommission, repower, or redevelop our renewable energy generation technology that has reached the end of its useful life, important considerations must be weighed, including:
- What are the regulatory risks?
- Do the existing laws apply?
- What permits, approvals or exemptions are needed?
Over the past decade, increased deployment of solar and wind projects has been more and more prevalent as policy makers at all levels of government seek to increase renewable energy portfolios. This, of course, is aided by rapidly declining costs of solar and wind systems, increasing demand for clean energy technologies, the passage of supportive public policy, investing in transmission infrastructure, increasing social acceptance and improvements in technology.
As many of our nation’s first-generation energy projects reach the end of their lifespan, discussions of decommissioning weigh heavy on the minds of our elected officials and industry leaders. An early focus on the need to incorporate a government relations strategy into the mix may be wise, as companies navigate compliance with existing and new utility laws, environmental and waste laws and regulations, taxation and bonding, and other regulatory requirements. The foundations to these government relations strategies are relationships with executive branch officials, including agency administrators, utility commissions, environmental regulators, and federal land management agencies who may all play a role as renewable project owners seek to decommission older projects. In addition, legislators and other elected officials also may need to be consulted.
Early interaction is almost always best, as a strategic component of the due diligence and planning efforts. A government relations strategy should be launched well before the decommissioning process begins. Representatives must conduct an environmental scan, and determine where attention needs to be focused to secure introductions that can lead to negotiations surrounding issues such as taxation and bonding, jobs, existing infrastructure, as well as waste and recycling, before the terms of new or developing policies are thrust upon project owners.
For example, the Texas legislature recently passed legislation to promote the decommissioning of solar and wind power facilities, which created new definitions for solar power facility agreements, solar power facility as well as wind power facility. This new law specifically addresses decommissioning as a component of entering into an agreement to build a solar or wind facility. Other states, including Montana, have acted to address bonding and decommissioning plans. The ability to modernize outdated laws can enable companies to plan ahead and incorporate all costs of a power project – planning, construction, operation and decommissioning – at the outset. Innovators in the renewable energy field have seen the need for certainty. This development is possible by creating holistic decommissioning strategies, and holistic strategies need to be implemented now.
Strategic planning will identify the legal and regulatory hurdles to be overcome. It is important to coordinate efforts with internal government relations team members to evaluate and determine a plan to work within the existing framework or on a strategy to modernize and update those hurdles.
For more information visit our Renewable Energy End-of-Life Planning page or contact Steve Moortel at smoortel@lewisroca.com.
Tags: Renewable Energy End-of-Life PlanningAbout This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam