As we navigate through these uncertain times and face challenges like never seen before in the world of commercial leasing, landlords and tenants should be cautioned against the unintended consequences of their actions. The coronavirus crisis began with shutdowns all across the country, and sharp falls in revenues followed quickly thereafter. As soon as it became apparent that business-as-usual was turning into business-out-of-the-ordinary, tenants started assessing long term sustainability in a world subject to stay-at-home orders. Operations were shut down, some by law and others by necessity, but whatever the reason, the decline in business has led to the conclusion by many business owners that paying rent would now need to be reconsidered. Nonpayment of rent seemed justified under the circumstances however, as more and more tenants sent letters to landlords advising them that April rent would not be paid (and it was not known when they would resume paying rent again), the reaction of landlords was unknown. Would landlords send default letters or would they propose lease modifications or would there be a combination of both? As the middle of April approaches, it seems clear that we will see a combination of both. Unpaid April rent is now overdue, and without agreements in place governing the effect of such delinquencies, tenants again face another uncertainty.
Although many jurisdictions around the county have issued executive orders prohibiting commercial evictions, lock outs and dispossession, the orders do not prohibit landlords from asserting a rent default. These orders simply limit, for the time being, landlords’ remedies against defaulting tenants. Therefore, it is becoming common practice for landlords to deliver written notices to tenants placing them in default. Landlords are reserving their rights and remedies against defaulting tenants in these letters. Whether the default is immediate or subject to a notice and cure period, the default in most cases is inevitable unless the parties agree in writing to acknowledge a change in status.
This gap between the executive orders and the rights of landlords to enforce remedies against tenants is risky territory— where tenants could suffer the unintended consequences of a rent default.
Unintended Consequences of a Rent Default
While many tenants are laser focused on cash flow and cannot afford to pay rent, a rent default, if left unanswered, will result in tenants and guarantors unwittingly forfeiting rights and options under leases, perhaps subjecting tenants to additional costs in late fees and interest charges.
Rights and Options
Leases commonly condition various rights and options granted to tenants on tenant not being in default or having allowed to occur any event of default. The right to renew, the right of first refusal, the right to expand, the right to terminate, among other lease clauses, are all commonly conditioned on no default having occurred.
Concessions
Concessions, including rent abatement clauses, are often undone by events of default, triggering immediate additional monetary obligations.
Assignment and Subletting
Tenants, who unfortunately, will not have the wherewithal to survive the crisis, may be looking to assignment and subletting provisions as an exit strategy once the crisis subsides. However, the assignment and subletting provisions are also often conditioned on no event of default having occurred.
Guaranty
Tenants should also consider the effect of a default on the guaranty, if applicable. Not only may a landlord now pursue the guarantor for the rent default, but also if a release of the guaranty is conditioned on there not having been an event of default, such release will no longer be available.
Security Deposit
Security deposits also factor into the default analysis, as they are available for a landlord’s use to cure the default pursuant to the terms of the lease. The security deposit will need to be replenished and landlords, given the current environment, may request an increased security deposit to replace the funds.
Late Fees and Interest
Rent defaults will inevitably trigger the assessment of late fees and interest. Sometimes there are grace periods and we have seen that some landlords are proactively waiving these fees for the moment, but tenants should be advised to address these fees in any resolution reached with the landlord.
Tenants should respond to the default letters and consider the various effects that a rent default might have on a tenant’s rights under the lease. The discussions and resolutions with landlords will look different depending on the given situation, but should contain more than a solution for rent deferral, restructure or adjustment. The parties should give thoughtful consideration to the ripple effects of an event of default to ensure that any resolution allows for long term viability and optionality as originally negotiated when entering into the lease.
For more information contact Amy Altshuler at aaltshuler@lewisroca.com or visit www.lewisroca.com.
Tags: COVID-19 Rapid Response Team, Real Estate, Real Estate Leasing- Partner
Amy Altshuler is a partner in the firm's Business Transactions Practice Group and the firm's Real Estate Practice Group. She practices in the areas of real estate leasing (retail, commercial, and industrial), land acquisition, and land development. She also advises on related corporate ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam