On April 27, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued guidance regarding investment advisory firms’ duty to disclose loans obtained under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) created under Section 1102 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The SEC has concluded that an advisory firm must disclose to clients that it has taken a PPP loan to counter the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in response to Item 18 (Financial Information) of Part 2A of Form ADV (brochure), or as part of Part 2A, Appendix 1 of Form ADV (wrap fee program brochure).
https://www.sec.gov/investment/covid-19-response-faq (“SEC FAQ”)
The SEC’s position regarding disclosure of PPP loans might seem to be inconsistent with FINRA’s determination that forgiveness of an approved PPP loan does not trigger a disclosure obligation in response to Form U4 Question 14K as a “compromise with creditors.”[1] However, the results are not inconsistent because, in essence, FINRA imposes an after-the-fact “actual debt default” standard on FINRA associated persons while the SEC imposes a higher fiduciary duty standard on advisory firms to disclose the “likelihood” of current or future financial difficulty. Specifically, Form U4 Question 14K only comes into play when an associated person is unable to satisfy a debt obligation in full and he or she enters a compromise with the creditor. The reasoning is an associated person having financial difficulty could put investor assets at risk. The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 imposes a fiduciary duty to disclose material facts regarding current events that “are likely” to impact the firm’s current or future ability to “provide advisory services” or to fulfill the firm’s “contractual obligations” to clients.
The SEC Staff’s position is an advisory firm should make broad disclosures, including all material facts impacting the advisory relationship, including the reason for and the “nature, amounts and effects” of the of the PPP loan/financial assistance. See SEC FAQ: Question II.4. For example, if it is likely that an advisory firm cannot pay the individuals who provide advisory services without a PPP loan, that risk is a material fact and must be disclosed. Similarly, if the advisory firm determines that it is reasonably likely the firm will be unable to meet its contractual obligations to clients, such as repayment of advisory fees charged in advance, without a PPP loan, that is a material event and risk the advisory firm must disclosed. The SEC guidance sheds much-needed light on the distinction between FINRA’s determination that the disclosure of a PPP loan is required on Form U4 only after default and the SEC’s determination that immediate disclosure in the advisory firm’s Form ADV brochure is required for events which necessitate a PPP loan or other financial assistance.
Finally, and equally important, even if an advisory firm elects to forgo or is unable to obtain a PPP loan or other financial assistance, the firm must disclose to clients if the COVID-19 crisis is likely to have a material impact upon the firm’s ability to provide advisory services to clients or to fulfill the firm’s contractual obligations to them.
This Alert does not constitute legal advice. Required disclosures may vary. Advisors should consult with regulatory counsel to determine their specific disclosure obligations.
For more information contact Ed Barkel at ebarkel@lewisroca.com.
- Partner
Ed brings a first-hand knowledge of business-based experience to craft legal strategies that advance his client’s business.
Ed Barkel is the lead partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation and Broker-Dealers Litigation Practice Group. He defends broker-dealers and individual ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam