Prize-linked savings (PLS) accounts are a new and exciting way for banking customers to experience the thrill of a lottery while personally funding their savings account. PLS accounts add a lottery-style feature to certain savings accounts where financial institutions offer incentives to its customers to win prizes. These prizes are funded by the interest that accrues from the pool of prize-linked accounts.
In 2014, Congress passed the American Savings Promotions Act which allowed certain financial institutions to offer incentivized savings accounts to customers with the chance to win monthly, quarterly and annual prizes by depositing into their PLS account. Prior to this, banks were prohibited from advertising any promotions related to a game of chance linked to bank accounts. To date, over 30 states have enacted legislation to authorize promotional raffles linked to savings accounts. Notably, California allows banks to offer promotional raffles for savings accounts, as long as bank depositors are not required to pay a fee or provide any consideration to enter the savings promotion and all participants have an equal chance of winning. Meanwhile, Arizona Revised Statue §6-559, allows credit unions to offer a savings promotion account including an incentive, provided that the only requirement to obtain the incentive is a deposit of a specified amount of money in the savings account.
Although the logistics behind a prize-linked savings account vary from account to account, the core principle remains true; it involves giving an account holder a chance to win a prize made up of a pool of the interest rates from other PLS accounts. Essentially, an account holder opens a PLS account either at a bank or credit union and the more money they place in their savings account, the higher chance they have at winning a prize.
The prize pool is comprised of the interest collected on all of the prize-linked savings accounts. Instead of incurring interest on their money deposited, a customer has a chance at winning the pool at the end of the prize period in a lottery style random drawing. At its most basic level, certain dollar amounts contributed to a savings account are essentially converted into free lottery- style tickets. Importantly, the account holder never loses their principle amount placed in their savings account. Instead, this “no-loss lottery” incentivizes customers to contribute more money to their savings accounts, thereby increasing their chances of winning the lottery all while funding their savings account.
During an era of such uncertainty, and where there tends to be a lack of a propensity to save, this dynamic banking style provides a new and entertaining way for banks and other financial institutions to engage customers while appealing to people’s desires to win. Ultimately, PLS accounts allow banks and financial institutions to improve consumers’ financial behaviors through gamification.
If you have any questions regarding PLS accounts or whether your bank or financial institutions is eligible to offer such accounts, please contact our authors Karl Rutledge at krutledge@lewisroca.com or Glenn Light at glight@lewisroca.com.
Tags: Regulated Commercial Gaming- Partner
Karl is known for his dedication and unmatched industry knowledge. His experience helps clients take full advantage of the opportunities in an evolving market.
Karl Rutledge is the former chair of the Commercial Gaming Group and current managing partner of the firm’s Nevada offices. He ...
- Partner
Glenn provides practical solutions to his clients’ problems, and understands the importance of hard work and diligence to meet their business goals.
Glenn Light is a Partner and Chair of the firm's Gaming Industry Group. He provides counsel on nearly every aspect of commercial gaming ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam