Plaintiffs’ counsel have developed a new weapon in their arsenal for privacy litigation involving tracking pixels: Arizona’s “Telephone, Utility and Communication Service Records Law,” A.R.S. § 44-1376 et seq.
Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
Over the past few years, numerous businesses have been hit with putative class-action lawsuits asserting that their use of tracking pixels and related tools for digital analytics is unlawful under various state or federal privacy laws or regulations. Until recently, relatively few of those cases had been filed in Arizona courts or under Arizona law.
In the past few weeks, however, multiple such cases have been filed in Arizona courts, asserting claims under Arizona law, including A.R.S. § 44-1376 et seq. Among other things, plaintiffs in these cases assert that businesses using tracking pixels are violating the Arizona Telephone, Utility and Communication Service Records Law, which was enacted in 2006, because they are knowingly procuring “communication service records” (as defined in the statute) without customer authorization or by deceptive means.
As a result of these cases, and because neither the law nor plaintiffs’ theories have been thoroughly tested at this point, it appears that Arizona might become a new battleground for nationwide privacy litigation.
If you have been sued for an alleged violation of A.R.S. § 44-1376 et seq., or if you have questions about Arizona privacy law, please contact John Gray, CIPP/US, or another member of Lewis Roca’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Group. As the chair of Lewis Roca’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Group, John represents clients in various regulatory investigations and litigation matters relating to privacy or data-protection issues, including data-breach class actions. He also advises clients on compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and various other laws and regulations pertaining to data privacy and protection.
Lewis Roca’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Group has extensive experience navigating the cybersecurity and data privacy issues associated with regulated industries and general business operations. Our lawyers successfully protect and defend clients’ most confidential data, relying on our technical training in electrical engineering and computer science as well as certifications from professional privacy organizations. We routinely review and follow the multitude of cybersecurity and data privacy laws at the federal and state level in the United States in addition to those pursuant to key international regulations.
Tags: Data Privacy and Cybersecurity- Of Counsel
John Gray is Of Counsel in Lewis Roca’s Litigation Practice Group and leads the firm’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Group. He is also a member of the firm’s AI Task Force.
As a litigator, John has more than a decade of experience in Arizona, California, and other forums across the ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam