Lawyers who advise clients in financial distress are searching for answers for their clients. Ultimately, cash flow and fundamentals are critical to business survival, but other tools can help. Is it coincidence that the Small Business Reorganization Act became effective as the nation unknowingly was headed to financial crisis?
The SBRA attempts to simplify and streamline chapter 11 bankruptcy for small businesses. Here are the major provisions and an evaluation of their utility as prescriptions in the current crisis.
New Chapter 11? The SBRA creates subchapter V of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. It was effective February 19, 2020. Rather than create a new form of chapter 11, the SBRA attempts to streamline chapter 11 for small businesses.
Eligibility. Subchapter V cases can be filed by debtors with no more than $2,725,625 of total (secured and unsecured) debt. (This amount was increased for one year to $7,500,000 for cases filed after signing of the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act” (CARES Act). This changes opened Subchapter V to virtually all small business, non-single asset real estate entities, where at least 50% of the debt arose from commercial or business activities.) Companies may use it, as may individuals for debts whose debts are mostly commercial or business debts. An eligible debtor must elect application of Subchapter V.
Why Subchapter V? Bankruptcy offers an automatic stay, use of cash collateral, tools for lending, picking and choosing contracts to keep or discard, sale of assets, and ultimately reorganization. Traditional problems with bankruptcy involve time and expense. SBRA attempts to help in these ways:
Plan exclusivity. In traditional chapter 11, the debtor has a limited, exclusive period to file a plan, which can be terminated. In Subchapter V, only the debtor can file a plan. Creditors may not hijack the bankruptcy.
No creditors committee. In most chapter 11 cases, a committee of creditors is appointed to watchdog the debtor in possession. The committee can employ counsel and professionals at the debtor’s expense. There generally is no creditors committee in Subchapter V.
Standing trustee. In chapter 13, a standing trustee handles payments to creditors and supervises the debtor and the plan. In Subchapter V, a standing trustee is appointed, and may continue to handle payments after plan confirmation. The idea is for the trustee help the debtor to confirmation.
Speed. The debtor must file a plan within 90 days of the voluntary bankruptcy filing. The disclosure requirements of chapter 11 are simplified and the disclosure statement hearing need not occur separately.
Loans on residences. Loans used primarily in connection with a small business, not used to acquire a residence of the debtor, may be modified. This is not true in chapter 11.
Flexible cramdown. Cramdown is plan confirmation over objection of one or more creditor classes. Subchapter V dispenses with the requirements that all impaired classes accept the plan, and that one such class must be calculated without including insiders. The absolute priority rule, requiring full creditor payment or termination of owners’ equity, does not apply. One price of cramdown under Subchapter V is that post-petition property acquisitions and earnings from services performed by the debtor are included in the debtor’s estate, increasing creditor recoveries. Another is that the cramdown plan can be modified after it is substantially consummated. A third is that the discharge does not occur until completion of all plan payments or a limited hardship discharge is granted.
SBRA and the optional Subchapter V case offers somewhat simpler, quicker reorganization choices with tradeoffs involving a trustee’s control and provisions directing increased creditor distributions. The CARES Act opens Subchapter V to most small businesses. It is not a simple, efficient option to use bankruptcy to cure financial distress, because, other than perhaps chapter 7, there is no such thing.
For more information, please contact Rob Charles at rcharles@lrrc.com.
Also, please find “Top 10 Things a Business in Distress Should be Doing Right Now,” authored by Rob Charles, and Justin Henderson, partner in the Phoenix office.
Looking for more steps on what to do next? Authored by Rob Charles, and Justin Henderson, a partner in the Phoenix office. |
This material has been prepared by Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Specific issues dealing with COVID-19 are fluid and this alert is intended to provide information as it is currently available. Readers should not act upon any information without seeking professional legal advice. Any communication you may have with a Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP attorney, through this announcement or otherwise, should not be understood by you to be attorney-client communication unless and until you and the firm agree to enter into an attorney-client relationship.
- Partner
Rob is always present. He is committed to you and your matters and is available when you need him. He will find a solution.
Rob Charles is a partner and leader in the firm’s Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights Practice Group, practicing throughout Arizona and Nevada. He represents clients in ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam