On February 6, 2020, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) published an Examination Guide announcing new rules scheduled to go into effect on February 15. Among the new rules is a requirement that any trademark owner (e.g. applicant, registrant, or party to a litigation matter before the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board) provide a valid email address for correspondence, even if there is an appointed U.S. attorney.
Trademark owners must provide an email address that is “accessible and regularly reviewed by the applicant, registrant, or party” and allows the USPTO to “directly contact” the trademark owner, even if the trademark owner is represented by counsel. The purpose of the new rule is for the USPTO to have a way to directly contact the trademark owner in case the appointed representative is terminated or otherwise inaccessible for any reason. If an attorney is appointed, then two email addresses will be required—one for the owner’s email address field and one for the attorney’s email address field. The USPTO Examination Guide offers the following examples of acceptable email addresses:
- A personal email address
- An email address created separately for the purpose of communicating with the USPTO
- In-house counsel’s email address for a juristic entity owner
- An officer’s or partner’s individual email address for a corporate or partnership owner
- A holding company officer’s individual email address
- A juristic entity owner’s email address
The Examination Guide is unclear as to when existing applications and registrations must be updated with this new information. We suspect a trademark owner email address will have to be added to existing applications or registrations at the time of the next responsive action (e.g. responding to an office action, filing a declaration of use, filing a renewal). At the very least, any new application filed on or after February 15 will require the trademark owner to provide a valid email address at the time of filing, or a filing date will not be generated.
The trademark owner’s email address will be publicly accessible, although a petition may be filed to redact the email address in an extraordinary situation. Current USPTO rules and regulations do not set forth what would be considered an “extraordinary situation” to allow redaction of the trademark owner’s email address. Even if a trademark owner wants to request an email address be redacted, such a request would have to be made after a new trademark application is filed, so it is still possible for the trademark owner’s email address to be published publicly for a limited period of time, even if it is subsequently redacted. A petition to redact also requires an additional $100 USPTO fee plus attorney’s fees.
Unfortunately, this new rule will expose trademark owners to potential scammers and spammers. Many trademark practitioners and owners have already contacted the USPTO to express legitimate privacy concerns and to try to at least delay the rollout of this new rule until better safeguards can be implemented. However, presuming the rule goes into effect February 15, we encourage trademark owners to consider what email address they would be willing to provide to the USPTO and prepare as necessary, which may include setting up a separate dedicated email address to comply with the new USPTO rule.
For more information or questions, please contact David Jackson (DJackson@lrrc.com) or Jennifer Van Kirk (JVanKirk@lrrc.com), or reach out to your personal contact at Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie.
Tags: Trademark- Partner
David Jackson provides a full spectrum of intellectual property services and works closely with clients to help them develop comprehensive, global brand strategies. Clients value David’s creativity, strategic judgment, and ability to understand their business needs to help them best ...
- Partner
Jennifer Van Kirk counsels clients on a wide variety of intellectual property matters, including all aspects of trademark and brand protection: trademark clearance, prosecution, licensing, portfolio management, and litigation guidance. Her experience includes traditional ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam