Twitter has been referred to as "the Wild West of the internet—a lawless, godless place designed for sinners and sure to corrupt the pure of heart."1 While Twitter may not corrupt everyone, it does open new avenues to commit trademark infringement.
What Are Hashtags and Hashflags?
A hashtag is a type of metadata tag used on social media symbolized with a "#" symbol. Users create a hashtag by placing the "#" sign in front of other text or characters, such as #love or #I_Hate_Mondays. This creates a searchable term on Twitter, Instagram, etc., and users can click on that hashtag to search for other social media posts using that same hashtag.2
A hashflag is a customized emoji (image) that is automatically inserted by Twitter in a tweet if a specific hashtag is used. Twitter launched hashflags for the 2010 World Cup.3 Twitter soon monetized this service, and started charging companies millions of dollars for a temporary hashflag.4 Coca-Cola was reportedly the first company to pay for a hashflag in 2015.5 For a period of time, anytime the hashtag #ShareaCoke was used, a custom emoji of two Coca-Cola bottles would automatically appear in the tweet:
Others joined in the fun. Taylor Swift had a custom emoji created for the release of the music video for "Bad Blood."6 Use of #BadBloodMusicVideo automatically inserted the below custom emoji into the tweet:
A Twitter emoji for #GameOfThrones was introduced in 2016:
Twitter introduced a number of custom emojis for the 2016 NBA All-Star game, including emojis for current All-Stars such as LeBron James, Steph Curry, and former players such as Charles Barkley.7
#CharlesBarkley #LeBronJames #StephenCurry
Trademark Clearance and Enforcement of Hashflags
The advent of custom Twitter emojis requires trademark and brand owners to consider whether to perform additional trademark clearance and enforcement efforts.
If your company or client is interested in securing a custom Twitter emoji, it is prudent to perform a thorough trademark clearance on both the hashtag and hashflag. If not, you can run into problems–just ask the Chicago Bears. For the start of the 2017 NFL season, Twitter unveiled customized emojis for each NFL team. For the Chicago Bears, use of the hashtag #GoBears would automatically insert the Chicago Bears logo into the tweet. Had the Chicago Bears (or Twitter) performed a trademark clearance for the mark GO BEARS, they would have discovered that the Regents of the University of California owns a trademark registration for GO BEARS for use in connection with computer software for enhancing the fan experience (among other relevant goods and services).8 The mascot of the University of California, Berkeley is the Golden Bears.9 Cal fans took notice, and were not too happy with the automatic insertion of the Chicago Bears logo into their tweets referring to the Golden Bears of the University of California. The official Cal Athletics Twitter account posted the following:
In fact, for a time, the official Twitter account for the University of California football team featured a logo of the Chicago Bears.10
A few days later, Twitter, the NFL, and the Chicago Bears had moved on to a new Twitter hashtag/hashflag linked to #DaBears, the University of California reclaimed #GoBears, and the issue appears to be resolved for now.
But this episode raises the broader question—what trademark clearance, if any, does Twitter actually perform before linking an emoji image with a hashtag? Twitter's official trademark policy is that "Using another's trademark in a manner that may mislead or confuse others about your brand affiliation may be a violation of our trademark policy."11 There is a lot of room for interpretation here.
So, yes, hashtag and hashflag infringement can be a "thing." Going forward, it is prudent for trademark and brand owners to monitor the use of Twitter custom emojis or hashflags for any infringement. A list of all current hashtag/hashflag custom emojis can be found at http://hashfla.gs/ and archived ones can be found at http://hashfla.gs/archive/. If you are counsel for an entity considering using this feature on Twitter, it would be prudent to perform a thorough trademark clearance prior to rolling out any custom emoji to avoid trademark infringement claims, and to avoid negative publicity. After the Chicago Bears were forced to give up #GoBears, at least one publication noted that the Chicago Bears were now 0-2 against the Pac-12 Conference—losing the #GoBears fight with the University of California, and apparently losing a prior trademark dispute with the University of Arizona over the mark Bear Down.12
Footnotes
[1] Wild, Andrew "#GoBears reclaimed by Cal football" The Daily Californian (Sept. 21, 2017) http://www.dailycal.org/2017/09/21/gobears-reclaimed-cal-football/ (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[2]See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashtag (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[3] Garrity, Justin, "How Custom Emojis Crowned Twitter the Hashtag Registar" Business 2 Community (Feb. 13, 2016) http://www.business2community.com/twitter/custom-emojis-crowned-twitter-hashtag-registrar-01451565#IPMioJXx8DMKzzoL.97 (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[4] Johnson, Lauren "Twitter's Branded Emojis Come With a Million-Dollar Commitment" Adweek (Feb. 2, 2016) http://www.adweek.com/digital/twitters-branded-emojis-come-million-dollar-commitment-169327/ (accessed Sept. 25, 2017).
[5] Johnson, Lauren "These 4 Brands Are Embracing the Twitter Emoji Craze" Adweek (Nov. 5, 2015) http://www.adweek.com/digital/these-4-brands-are-embracing-twitter-emoji-craze-167979/ (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[6] Wright, Mic, "Taylor Swift nabs Twitter's first celebrity custom emoji #BadBloodMusicVideo" TNW (May 17, 2015) https://thenextweb.com/twitter/2015/05/17/haters-gonna-hastag-hashtag-hashtag/#.tnw_UnrcJiTz (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[7] See http://hashfla.gs/nbaallstarto/ (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[8] U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 4750476.
[9] Full disclosure, I am a graduate of the UC Berkeley School of Law, Class of 2000.
[10] See Wong, Leland, "Chicago Bears co-opt #GoBears. Cal fans take it well." SB Nation California Golden Blogs https://www.californiagoldenblogs.com/2017/9/7/16272106/chicago-bears-california-golden-bears-go-bears-twitter-emoji-mike-ditka-hashtag (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[11] https://support.twitter.com/articles/18367 (accessed on September 25, 2017).
[12] Al-Khateeb, Zac, "Cal beats Chicago Bears, reclaims 'Go Bears' trademark" Sporting News (Sept. 12, 2017 http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/news/cal-golden-bears-chicago-trademark-go-bears-pac-12/1k4mv73l0ionq1bxj0cdi5m1bi (accessed September 25, 2017).
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Tags: Public Lands- Partner
Warren uses an objective and transparent approach to developing legal strategies. Calm under pressure, he is adept at navigating the most complex IP controversies.
G. Warren Bleeker is a partner in Lewis Roca's Intellectual Property Practice Group. Warren assists clients in resolving ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam