Consumer and industrial demand for gasoline has plummeted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, a geopolitical standoff between Saudi Arabia and Russia has created a worldwide oil glut. As a result, oil prices have dropped below levels necessary to maintain profitable production in many parts of the United States. Without a prompt recovery in prices, it can be expected that a sustained decrease in oil and gas activity will have an adverse financial impact on the myriad of businesses that provide supplies and services in the oil and gas sector. This, in turn, will likely lead to delinquencies and defaults on financial obligations.
Lenders and equipment lessors occasionally experience a rude surprise in situations in which statutory liens asserted by unpaid laborers and material providers attach to oilfield assets. Under certain circumstances, depending on applicable state law, these statutory liens can potentially prime properly perfected security and even leasehold interests. Prudent oilfield lenders and equipment lessors should be aware of the risks associated with statutory liens and monitor the circumstances in which they arise.
At oil and gas well sites, statutory liens can take the form of mechanics’ liens, oil and gas liens, and possessory liens. Each type of lien is a creature of state statute and the circumstances in which they arise and are perfected vary significantly from state to state. However, the overriding philosophy for the enactment of statutory liens is the same. These liens are designed to protect vendors, materialmen, and laborers who contribute to the value of real or personal property. The owner or lienholder should not profit at their expense. The problem, from the perspective of a lender or finance lessor, is that statutory liens can sometimes take priority over consensual liens or leasing agreements. In those situations, the statutory lien must be satisfied before a secured creditor can realize on its collateral or a lessor can recover its equipment.
- A mechanic’s lien is usually available to a party that provides labor or materials incorporated into a structure or improvement on land. This will usually include a well site. Mechanic’s liens statutes are interpreted broadly to include architects, engineers, and draftsmen, along with subcontractors and suppliers who may not have a direct contractual relationship with the owner.
- Oil and gas or mineral liens are similar to mechanic’s liens but generally tailored to apply to the peculiarities of oil and gas development. Depending on state law, mechanic’s liens and mineral liens may provide overlapping remedies.
- Possessory liens are limited to personal property and arise where labor, service, or storage has been provided. The possessory lien exists by virtue of the lienholder’s possession of the property and terminates if possession is voluntarily surrendered.
A survey of lien statutes in some of the oil and gas producing states reflects a wide variety of statutory schemes. Deadlines for perfection and foreclosure vary from state to state. Different rules also apply as to the extent to which the lien relates back.
State |
Mechanic’s Lien |
Oil & Gas Lien |
Possessory Lien |
Arizona |
§ 33-981, et seq. |
§ 33-989 (mining) |
§ 33-1021 |
Colorado |
§ 38-22-101, et seq. |
§ 38-24-101, et seq. |
§ 38-20-101, et seq. |
Montana |
§ 71-3-521, et seq. |
71-3-1001, et seq. |
§ 71-3-1201, et seq. |
North Dakota |
Chpt. 35-27 |
Chpt. 35-24 |
Chpt. 35-20 |
Oklahoma |
Title 42, § 141 |
Title 42, § 144 |
Title 42, § 91 |
Texas |
Tex. Prop. Code, Ch. 53 |
Tex. Prop. Code, Ch. 56 |
Tex. Prop. Code, Ch. 70 |
Wyoming |
§ 29-2-101, et seq. |
§ 29-3-101, et seq. |
§ 29-7-101, et seq. |
It is not possible to completely eliminate the risk of becoming a victim of a statutory lien. However, prudent lending and leasing practices can significantly reduce the level of exposure. On site-specific loans, careful monitoring of draw requests and obtaining lien releases go a long way toward avoiding surprises in the event of default and foreclosure. For equipment lessors, careful monitoring of equipment and prompt action in the event of default are useful tools.
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP has significant experience representing creditors, equipment lessors, and servicing companies in oil and gas insolvencies throughout the western United States, including Storm Cat Energy (USA) Corp. (Colo); PRB Energy, Inc. (Colo); Red Eagle Oil, Inc. (Wyo); Stone & Wolf, LLC (Wyo); and PetroShare Corp. (Colo.).
For more information, please contact Brent Cohen at bcohen@lrrc.com or visit www.lrrc.com.
Tags: COVID-19 Rapid Response Team, Environmental and Natural Resources, Natural ResourcesAbout This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam